We talk endlessly about technical debt—the shortcuts in code that eventually come back to bite us. But there's another kind of debt accumulating in your organization right now, silently strangling productivity and engagement.
Collaboration Debt is the real reason your team has stopped speaking up, stopped caring, and started going through the motions.
The Problem You Can't Name
Agile Head, Consultant, Scrum Master, and Agile Coach Marcin "Aks" Grochowina spent years asking the wrong question: "How do we improve collaboration?" After watching the same frameworks work brilliantly in one team and crash spectacularly in another, he realized he was approaching it backwards.
The real question is: "What's blocking collaboration in the first place?"
That shift in perspective led to his Collaboration Debt model. A framework that explains why your team agreements are just words on paper, why your psychological safety initiatives aren't working, and why only 13% of European workers feel engaged at work (9% in Poland).
The Anatomy of Collaboration Debt
Collaboration Debt has three core components that feed off each other:
Process Debt: Those workflows that everyone tolerates but nobody believes in. The meetings that could be emails, the approvals that add no value, the tools that create more friction than flow.
People Debt: Not about individuals—about relationships. When trust erodes and conflicts go unaddressed, when the team dynamic becomes every person for themselves.
Information Debt: The knowledge gaps, the outdated documentation, the decisions made in isolation that leave everyone else guessing.
These three create a vicious cycle. Bad processes strain relationships. Strained relationships lead to information hoarding. Poor information quality demands more controlling processes. It goes around.
The Response Capacity
Response Capacity acts as a buffer against Collaboration Debt. High response capacity means people are open to responding and giving feedback. This means you can quickly adapt, fix problems, and implement solutions.
Low response capacity—think layers of hierarchy, bureaucratic approval processes, fear of speaking up—means debt accumulates faster than you can pay it down.
This is why the same change management approach works in a startup but fails in a corporation. It's not about the people—it's about the system's ability to respond.
Why Your Team Went Silent
Ever notice how teams start eager to give feedback, then gradually go quiet? That's not apathy—that's learned helplessness. When people consistently experience that their input doesn't matter, they stop providing it. The silence isn't disengagement; it's self-preservation.
We spend enormous energy finding the "perfect" employees, then immediately start micromanaging them. We ask for their expertise in interviews, then tell them exactly how to do their job. No wonder they check out.
Breaking the Cycle
Aks created a Collaboration Debt canvas to help teams identify and address their specific Collaboration Debt. It's not about another framework or checklist—it's about having honest conversations about what's broken.
The key questions aren't complex:
What problems are we avoiding?
How would success look different?
What small step can we take tomorrow?
The Stakes Are High
This isn't just about workplace efficiency. When people spend eight hours a day in environments where they can't contribute meaningfully, where their expertise is ignored, where they've learned to stay silent, that affects their entire life quality.
Collaboration Debt is a life quality issue and not just a business problem.
Moving Forward
Start by acknowledging that Collaboration Debt exists in your organization. It's an inevitable byproduct of how work gets done at scale. The question isn't whether you have it, but whether you're intentionally paying it down or accidentally accumulating more.
While technical debt might slow down your releases, Collaboration Debt is slowly killing your team's soul.
Want to explore this further? Check out the full conversation between me and Marcin Aks on the Agile State of Mind podcast, where we dive deeper into the model and its practical applications.
Share this post